Lenin Studies: Method and Organisation

Historical Materialism 25 (4):105-138 (2017)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The growing field of Lenin Studies has been nurtured by the growth of crises and struggles in our own time and may contribute to present-day activists’ efforts at developing revolutionary strategy, organisation and struggle. Surveying this field, it is worth focusing on three recent studies by Antonio Negri, Tamás Krausz and Alan Shandro which give attention to the methodological core of what can be called ‘Leninism’. All three distinguish Lenin’s approach to Marxism from that of such prominent Marxists as Kautsky. The result, highlighted by aspects of Lenin’s functioning in the early Communist International, provides a more consistent activist- and revolutionary edge that might have relevance for future struggles, particularly in relation to the question of organisation.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,932

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Editorial Introduction.Paul Blackledge - 2010 - Historical Materialism 18 (3):25-33.
Lenin Disputed.Lars T. Lih - 2010 - Historical Materialism 18 (3):108-174.
Lenin Rediscovered?Chris Harman - 2010 - Historical Materialism 18 (3):64-74.
Lenin and the crisis of Russian Marxism.Marina F. Bykova - 2018 - Studies in East European Thought 70 (4):235-247.
Marxism after Marx: Karl Kautsky’s Disputed Legacy.Ben Lewis - 2017 - Historical Materialism 25 (3):141-147.
Lenin and Philosophy Should We Not Pose This Problem Anew?A. Volodin - 1991 - Russian Studies in Philosophy 30 (1):70-87.
On Lenin’s Materialism and empiriocriticism.David Bakhurst - 2018 - Studies in East European Thought 70 (2-3):107-119.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-10-27

Downloads
34 (#458,410)

6 months
10 (#382,620)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?