The independence of δ1n

Journal of Symbolic Logic 64 (1):350 - 362 (1999)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this paper we prove the independence of δ 1 n for n ≥ 3. We show that δ 1 4 can be forced to be above any ordinal of L using set forcing. For δ 1 3 we prove that it can be forced, using set forcing, to be above any L cardinal κ such that κ is Π 1 definable without parameters in L. We then show that δ 1 3 cannot be forced by a set forcing to be above every cardinal of L. Finally we present a class forcing construction to make δ 1 3 greater than any given L cardinal

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,779

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Independence of $delta^1_n$.Amir Leshem & Menachem Magidor - 1999 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 64 (1):350-362.
The weak square property.Steve Jackson - 2001 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 66 (2):640-657.
The complexity of the core model.William J. Mitchell - 1998 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 63 (4):1393-1398.
Universal partial indestructibility and strong compactness.Arthur W. Apter - 2005 - Mathematical Logic Quarterly 51 (5):524-531.
Some Remarks on Normal Measures and Measurable Cardinals.Arthur W. Apter - 2001 - Mathematical Logic Quarterly 47 (1):35-44.
Indestructibility and stationary reflection.Arthur W. Apter - 2009 - Mathematical Logic Quarterly 55 (3):228-236.
Two weak consequences of 0#. [REVIEW]M. Gitik, M. Magidor & H. Woodin - 1985 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 50 (3):597 - 603.
Blowing up power of a singular cardinal—wider gaps.Moti Gitik - 2002 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 116 (1-3):1-38.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
36 (#431,390)

6 months
9 (#438,283)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references