Why science isn't literature: The importance of differences

In Allan Megill (ed.), Rethinking Objectivity. Duke University Press. pp. 65--79 (1994)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,471

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Some Current Issues in Contemporary Criticism of Renaissance Literature.Andrew Hadfield - 2009 - Journal of Philosophy: A Cross-Disciplinary Inquiry 4 (9):1-11.
Importance of studying veterinary science literature in ancient India.R. P. Tyagi - 1987 - Graduate Faculty Philosophy Journal 22 (1):93.
Sex, gender, and science.Myra J. Hird - 2004 - New York: Palgrave-Macmillan.
Ayn Rand versus Adam Smith.Robert White - 2005 - Journal of Ayn Rand Studies 7 (1):141 - 180.
Incorporating Global Components into Ethics Education.George Wang & Russell G. Thompson - 2013 - Science and Engineering Ethics 19 (1):287-298.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-01-31

Downloads
1 (#1,905,797)

6 months
1 (#1,478,856)

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references