Of Mi Fu's Painting and His Copying of Painting Taken as the Authentic
Abstract
Mi Fu had clinical history painting the real thing, Painting and other super-wonderful view. This paper argues that this claim can not be established. Whether painting from the Michaelis-Menten skill point of view, or from his masterpieces are extremely rare, and even worship only meters from the book when people do not speak m terms of painting and so on, Mi Fu and the book did not meet the standards of art are extremely environment. Pro painting really as to create chaos, based on the skill and self-cultivation in Mie still lacking; if to copy the system purely as a means, is at odds with his lofty character of; and Milosevic in painting style is quite different from traditional and each time, to "do school" and "temporary transfer" is no other painting can. In short, Mi Fu is not the strict sense of the artist, the history of transmission in the clinical picture of Milosevic, "the real thing can not be identified," the words, the Department of misunderstanding due to previous records