Chronic Temptation, Reasonable Firmness and the Criminal Law

Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 34 (1):75-96 (2014)

Abstract
The criminal law requires citizens to demonstrate ‘reasonable firmness’ in the face of temptations to violate its provisions. But what if individuals repeatedly face powerful temptations to offend, are not responsible for being in such predicaments, cannot escape them, and cannot alter or expunge their desires because they count as urgent on any plausible account of a decent human life? Should the criminal law make some sort of allowance for the chronically tempted? I argue that it should, because individuals in such predicaments will have to exhibit exemplary if not extraordinary self-control. Intuitively, such self-control is more than the criminal law can reasonably demand of individuals. Also, there is empirical evidence that repeated acts of self-control wear down individuals. Numerous objections to the position I defend are addressed and its implications for the criminal law are briefly explored
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1093/ojls/gqt015
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 40,736
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Completion of Criminal Proceeding Within a Reasonable Time in Latvia.Sandra Kaija - 2013 - Jurisprudencija: Mokslo darbu žurnalas 20 (2):725-748.
Criminal Justice and the Liberal Polity.Jonathan Jacobs - 2011 - Criminal Justice Ethics 30 (2):173-191.
International Criminal Law and Philosophy.Larry May & Zachary Hoskins (eds.) - 2010 - Cambridge University Press.
Canadian Scholars on Criminal Responsibility.Stephen P. Garvey - 2015 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 9 (2):351-364.
Why Criminal Law: A Question of Content? [REVIEW]Douglas Husak - 2008 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 2 (2):99-122.
The Intrusion of Mercy.R. A. Duff - 2007 - Ohio State Journal of Criminal Law 4:361-87.
Preventive Justice and the Presumption of Innocence.Kimberly Kessler Ferzan - 2014 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 8 (2):505-525.
Vice Laws and Self-Sovereignty.Peter Marneffe - 2013 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 7 (1):29-41.
Vice Laws and Self-Sovereignty.Peter de Marneffe - 2013 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 7 (1):29-41.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2013-12-12

Total views
13 ( #587,858 of 2,243,850 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
7 ( #253,332 of 2,243,850 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature