Limit ultrapowers and abstract logics

Journal of Symbolic Logic 52 (2):437-454 (1987)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

We associate with any abstract logic L a family F(L) consisting, intuitively, of the limit ultrapowers which are complete extensions in the sense of L. For every countably generated [ω, ω]-compact logic L, our main applications are: (i) Elementary classes of L can be characterized in terms of $\equiv_L$ only. (ii) If U and B are countable models of a countable superstable theory without the finite cover property, then $\mathfrak{U} \equiv_L \mathfrak{B}$ . (iii) There exists the "largest" logic M such that complete extensions in the sense of M and L are the same; moreover M is still [ω,ω]-compact and satisfies an interpolation property stronger than unrelativized ▵-closure. (iv) If L = L ωω(Q α ) , then $\operatorname{cf}(\omega_\alpha) > \omega$ and $\lambda^\omega for all $\lambda . We also prove that no proper extension of L ωω generated by monadic quantifiers is compact. This strengthens a theorem of Makowsky and Shelah. We solve a problem of Makowsky concerning L κλ -compact cardinals. We partially solve a problem of Makowsky and Shelah concerning the union of compact logics

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,127

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
14 (#1,020,370)

6 months
38 (#100,987)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

A note on extensions of infinitary logic.Saharon Shelah & Jouko Väänänen - 2005 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 44 (1):63-69.
Ultrafilter translations.Paolo Lipparini - 1996 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 35 (2):63-87.
More on regular and decomposable ultrafilters in ZFC.Paolo Lipparini - 2010 - Mathematical Logic Quarterly 56 (4):340-374.

Add more citations