- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Methodisches Denken
[Frankfurt am Main]: Suhrkamp (1968)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)
Links
PhilArchive
External links
(no proxy)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Through your library
- Sign in / register and customize your OpenURL resolver
- Configure custom resolver
My notes
Similar books and articles
Methodisches Denken.Paul Lorenzen - 1970 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 1 (2):304-310.
On the modes of opposition in the formal dialogues of P. Lorenzen.Frank Van Dun - 1972 - Logique Et Analyse 57 (58):103-136.
Lorenzen Paul. Die ontologische und die operative Auffassung der Logik. Actes du Xlième Congres International de Philosophie, Volume V, Logique, analyse philosophique, philosophie des mathématiques, North-Holland Publishing Company, Amsterdam 1953, and Editions E. Nauwelaerts, Louvain 1953, pp. 12–18. [REVIEW]Carl G. Hempel - 1954 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 19 (1):65-66.
Mathematical reasoning and external symbolic systems.Catarina Dutilh Novaes - 2013 - Logique Et Analyse 56 (221):45-65.
Kleene Stephen C.. Realizability and Shanin's algorithm for the constructive deciphering of mathematical sentences. Logique et analyse , n.s. vol. 3 , pp. 154–165. [REVIEW]Donald L. Kreider - 1962 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 27 (2):243-244.
Review: Paul Lorenzen, Metamathematik. [REVIEW]Julia Robinson - 1966 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 31 (1):106-106.
Review: Paul Lorenzen, Formale Logik. [REVIEW]H. Hermes - 1967 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 32 (4):514-514.
Analytics
Added to PP
2015-02-02
Downloads
8 (#1,345,183)
6 months
4 (#862,833)
2015-02-02
Downloads
8 (#1,345,183)
6 months
4 (#862,833)
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Why Play Logical Games?Mathieu Marion - 2009 - In Ondrej Majer, Ahti-Veikko Pietarinen & Tero Tulenheimo (eds.), Games: Unifying Logic, Language, and Philosophy. Springer Verlag. pp. 3--26.
In the Beginning was Game Semantics?Giorgi Japaridze - 2009 - In Ondrej Majer, Ahti-Veikko Pietarinen & Tero Tulenheimo (eds.), Games: Unifying Logic, Language, and Philosophy. Springer Verlag. pp. 249--350.
The Concept of Argument: A Philosophical Foundation.Harald R. Wohlrapp - 2014 - Dordrecht NL: Springer.
Psychophysics as a science of primary experience.Jiří Wackermann - 2010 - Philosophical Psychology 23 (2):189 – 206.
The theory‐ladenness of observations, the role of scientific instruments, and the Kantiana priori.Ragnar Fjelland - 1991 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 5 (3):269 – 280.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-68866f4b87-w2v2s uwo