Cognitive Science 41 (S6):1434-1456 (2017)

Abstract
A speaker's manner of delivery of an utterance can affect a listener's pragmatic interpretation of the message. Disfluencies influence a listener's off-line assessment of whether the speaker is truthful or deceptive. Do listeners also form this assessment during the moment-by-moment processing of the linguistic message? Here we present two experiments that examined listeners’ judgments of whether a speaker was indicating the true location of the prize in a game during fluent and disfluent utterances. Participants’ eye and mouse movements were biased toward the location named by the speaker during fluent utterances, whereas the opposite bias was observed during disfluent utterances. This difference emerged rapidly after the onset of the critical noun. Participants were similarly sensitive to disfluencies at the start of the utterance and in the middle. Our findings support recent research showing that listeners integrate pragmatic information alongside semantic content during the earliest moments of language processing. Unlike prior work which has focused on pragmatic effects in the interpretation of the literal message, here we highlight disfluency's role in guiding a listener to an alternative non-literal message.
Keywords Psychology  Pragmatics  Language understanding
Categories No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
Reprint years 2017
DOI 10.1111/cogs.12378
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 64,178
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

The Psycholinguistics of Metaphor.Sam Glucksberg - 2003 - Trends in Cognitive Sciences 7 (2):92-96.
Using Uh and Um in Spontaneous Speaking.H. Clark - 2002 - Cognition 84 (1):73-111.

View all 6 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Comunicación y metáfora.E. Soria - 2003 - Análisis Filosófico 23 (2):167-192.
A Defense of Davidson's Theory of Metaphor.Robert Bower Horner - 1999 - Dissertation, University of Miami
Pragmatic Enrichment.Francois Recanati - 2010 - In Delia Fara & Gillian Russell (eds.), Routledge Companion to Philosophy of Language. Routledge. pp. 67-78.
Pragmatics and Logical Form.François Recanati - 2007 - In Esther Romero & Belen Soria (eds.), Explicit Communication: Robyn Carston's Pragmatics. Palgrave. pp. 25-41.
Truth-Conditional Pragmatics.François Recanati - 2010 - Oxford University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2016-06-01

Total views
10 ( #877,713 of 2,454,925 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #449,233 of 2,454,925 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes