Reply to William Dwyer: Compatibilism and Evolution

Journal of Ayn Rand Studies 4 (1):205-213 (2002)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

George Lyons criticizes as essentially rationalistic both the Objectivist concept of free will in Tibor Machan's Initiative: Human Agency and Society, and William Dwyer 's determinism in the compatibilist tradition derived from Hobbes. He draws attention to the general problem of compatibilism in modern philosophy. He focuses on how such scientific theorists as Daniel C. Dennett have gone beyond the ideas of Hobbes, in considering the complexities of action in evolutionary processes discovered by Darwin.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,990

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Reply to William Dwyer: Free Will Reconsidered.Tibor R. Machan - 2002 - Journal of Ayn Rand Studies 4 (1):215 - 220.
Do Knowledge, Ethics, and Liberty Require Free Will? [REVIEW]William Dwyer - 2001 - Journal of Ayn Rand Studies 3 (1):83 - 108.
Rejoinder to George Lyons.Roger E. Bissell - 2021 - Journal of Ayn Rand Studies 21 (1):126-140.
Reply to Roger E. Bissell.George Lyons - 2021 - Journal of Ayn Rand Studies 21 (1):118-126.
A veteran reconnoiters Ayn Rand's philosophy. [REVIEW]Robert L. Campbell - 2000 - Journal of Ayn Rand Studies 1 (2):293-312.
Where There's a Will, There's a “Why”.Roger E. Bissell - 2015 - Journal of Ayn Rand Studies 15 (1):67-96.
Ayn Rand, by Tibor Machan. [REVIEW]R. Bass - 2006 - Journal of Libertarian Studies 20 (2):95-101.
Dennett on Free Will.Craig Ross - 2011 - Metaphysica 12 (2):137-149.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-09-29

Downloads
22 (#699,905)

6 months
4 (#1,006,062)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references