A Reply to Louis P. Pojman’s Article "The Case Against Affirmative Action"

Conatus 5 (2):87 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Affirmative action is a public policy purposed to compensate the victims of injustice at the cost of priviledged groups; hence to some it appears as opposing the notion of equality and being against human dignity. Thinkers like Leslie Pickering Francis and John Rawls, on the other hand, argue that affirmative action policies should be implemented for the sake of the oppressed and under-represented groups. Louis P. Pojman in his article “The Case Against Affirmative Action” sets forth nine arguments against strong affirmative action. This paper sets out to challenge Pojman’s arguments one by one, and prove the author’s thesis in support of strong affirmative action.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,098

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2021-03-12

Downloads
25 (#654,840)

6 months
8 (#415,230)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The Case Against Affirmative Action.Louis P. Pojman - 1998 - International Journal of Applied Philosophy 12 (1):97-115.
Preferential Hiring and Compensation.Robert K. Fullinwider - 1975 - Social Theory and Practice 3 (3):307-320.
The moral status of affirmative action.Louis P. Pojman - 1992 - Public Affairs Quarterly 6 (2):181-206.
The role-model argument and faculty diversity.Anita L. Allen - 1993 - Philosophical Forum 24 (1-3):267-281.

Add more references