Beyond the Analytic of Finitude: Kant, Heidegger, Foucault

Foucault Studies 21:184-199 (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The editors of the French edition of Michel Foucault's Introduction to Kant's Anthropology claim that Foucault started rereading Kant through Nietzsche in 1952 and then began rereading Kant and Nietzsche through Heidegger in 1953. This claim has not received much attention in the scholarly literature, but its significance should not be underestimated. In this article, I assess the likelihood that the editor’s claim is true and show how Foucault’s introduction to Kant’s Anthropology and his comments about Kant in The Order of Things echo the concerns about finitude and subjectivity in Heidegger’s Kant and the Problem of Metaphysics. I then argue that Foucault's later preoccupation with Kant's essay An Answer to the Question: What is Enlightenment? should be regarded as an attempt to develop an alternative to the Heideggerian interpretation of Kant, and the preoccupation with finitude, that had played such an important role in Foucault’s earlier works.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,296

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Introduction to Kant’s ‘Anthropology’.Michel Foucault - 2008 - Semiotext(E). Edited by Roberto Nigro.
Anthropology as critique: Foucault, Kant and the metacritical tradition.Sabina F. Vaccarino Bremner - 2020 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 28 (2):336-358.
Heidegger on Kant, Finitude, and the Correlativity of Thinking and Being.Güçsal Pusar - 2018 - Journal of Speculative Philosophy 32 (3):400-413.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-04-14

Downloads
47 (#348,443)

6 months
10 (#308,815)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Colin McQuillan
St. Mary's University, Texas

Citations of this work

Anthropology as critique: Foucault, Kant and the metacritical tradition.Sabina F. Vaccarino Bremner - 2020 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 28 (2):336-358.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references