There are interesting parallels between some of McTaggart’s metaphysical views and developments from contemporary physics. Can McTaggart’s positive metaphysical views provide guidance in understanding how reality can be timeless at the fundamental level? I argue that the guidance McTaggart actually provides is limited – though not by any means useless.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Book Review:Some Dogmas of Religion. John McTaggart, Ellis McTaggart. [REVIEW]David Phillips - 1907 - Ethics 17 (3):383-.
Mc Taggart and the Truth About Time.Heather Dyke - 2002 - In Craig Callender (ed.), Time, Reality and Experience. Cambridge University Press. pp. 137-.
The Logical Structure of the Debate About McTaggart's Paradox.Quentin Smith - 1988 - Philosophy Research Archives 14:371-379.
Thoroughly Muddled Mctaggart: Or, How to Abuse Gauge Freedom to Create Metaphysical Monostrosities.Tim Maudlin - 2002 - Philosophers' Imprint 2 (4):1-23.
Category Theory Applied to a Radically New but Logically Essential Description of Time and Space.Dr John Yates - 2008 - Cogprints.
The Reality of Now.William Seager - 1999 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 13 (1):69 – 82.
A Token-Based Semantic Analysis of McTaggart's Paradox.Cheng-Chih Tsai - 2011 - Linguistic and Philosophical Investigations 10:107-124.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads59 ( #90,008 of 2,177,829 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #317,245 of 2,177,829 )
How can I increase my downloads?