The top twenty things to change in or around australia's international arbitration act

Abstract

In November 2008 Australia’s Attorney-General’s Department (AGD) initiated a Review of its International Arbitration Act (IAA), last substantially revised two decades ago by adopting the 1985 UNCITRAL Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration (ICA). This aims to claw back ground lost to arbitral venues in the Asia-Pacific, which also implies a clearer framework for enforcing foreign awards. A long-term goal may be to revive domestic arbitration in Australia, which has been languishing. The AGD’s Discussion Paper invited Submissions from the public on eight issues in particular. These include whether and how the IAA should incorporate various 2006 amendments to the Model Law, including relaxed writing requirements for arbitration agreements and broader scope for arbitrators to issue interim measures. We urge even more ambitious reform, covering the following “Top Twenty” issues (and numerous other sub-issues) under four headings. Guiding principles should be for the revised IAA to adopt more informal or expeditious solutions, and more global approaches. This is crucial to address the considerable statistical and anecdotal evidence of re-emergent costs and delays in ICA in Australia and world-wide. Stays 1. Arbitrability – scope and applicable law 2. Arbitration agreement – substantive validity and applicable law 3. Conditions on stays 4. Stays under s 7 vs ML Art 8 – alternatives and time limits 5. Arbitration agreement – formal validity and writing requirements Enforcing Awards 6. Two issues when Australia implemented NYC Art V 7. Enforcement possible only under IAA s 8 8. Enforcing awards set aside at seat 9. Suspending enforcement if setting aside sought at seat 10. Public policy 11. Interim measures Model Law 12. Opt-out and opt-in 13. Jurisdiction of courts and devolving powers to arbitral institutions 14. Arbitrators ruling on own Jurisdiction 15. Evidence 16. Arb-Med 17. Awards – copies and reasons 18. Other optional provisions - interest, costs and consolidation Overarching Issues 19. Confidentiality and privacy 20. Overarching principles.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,590

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Similar books and articles

Digital Evidence: The Admissibility of Leaked and Hacked Evidence in Arbitration Proceedings.Daniel Brantes Ferreira & Elizaveta A. Gromova - 2024 - International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue Internationale de Sémiotique Juridique 37 (3):903-922.
Dissenting and Concurring Opinions in International Investment Arbitration: How the Arbitrators Frame Their Need to Differ. [REVIEW]Ruth Breeze - 2012 - International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue Internationale de Sémiotique Juridique 25 (3):393-413.
Les tiers financeurs comme nouveaux acteurs du champ social arbitral: Reflexions à propos des implications ethiques.Milcar Jeff Dorce - 2024 - International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue Internationale de Sémiotique Juridique 37 (3):943-968.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-04-30

Downloads
10 (#395,257)

6 months
1 (#1,912,481)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references