What are neural networks not good at? On artificial creativity

Big Data and Society 6 (1) (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article discusses three dimensions of creativity: metaphorical thinking; social interaction; and going beyond extrapolation in predictions. An overview of applications of neural networks in these three areas is offered. It is argued that the current reliance on the apparatus of statistical regression limits the scope of possibilities for neural networks in general, and in moving towards artificial creativity in particular. Artificial creativity may require revising some foundational principles on which neural networks are currently built.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,296

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-11-24

Downloads
15 (#976,359)

6 months
4 (#862,833)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Metaphors we live by.George Lakoff & Mark Johnson - 1980 - Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Edited by Mark Johnson.
Metaphors We Live By.George Lakoff & Mark Johnson - 1980 - Ethics 93 (3):619-621.
Wittgenstein on rules and private language.Saul A. Kripke - 1982 - Revue Philosophique de la France Et de l'Etranger 173 (4):496-499.
Security, territory, population: lectures at the Collège de France, 1977-78.Michel Foucault - 2007 - New York: République Française. Edited by Michel Senellart & Arnold Ira Davidson.
De la Grammatologie.Jacques Derrida - 1967 - Paris,: Édtions de Minuit.

View all 14 references / Add more references