On Sellars' exam question trilemma: are Kant's premises analytic, or synthetic a priori, or a posteriori?

British Journal for the History of Philosophy 27 (2):402-421 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1080/09608788.2018.1524368

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,779

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Sellars' Exam Question Trilemma - Are Kant's Premises Analytic, or Synthetic A Priori, or A Posterior.James R. O'Shea - 2019 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 27 (2):402-421.
James R. O'Shea, ed. Sellars and His Legacy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016. 266pp. [REVIEW]Sebastián Sánchez Martínez - 2017 - Ideas Y Valores 66 (165):415-423.
Kant's Analytic Apparatus.Graham Bird - 2006 - In A Companion to Kant. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 125–139.
The Analytic Pragmatist Conception of the A Priori: C. I. Lewis and Wilfrid Sellars.James O'Shea - 2017 - In Sarin Marchetti & Maria Baghramian (eds.), Pragmatism and the European Traditions: Encounters with Analytic Philosophy and Phenomenology Before the Great Divide. London and New York: Routledge. pp. 203–227.
Knowledge and Experience. An Examination of the Four Reflective ‘Perspectives’ in Kant’s Critical Philosophy.Stephen Palmquist - 1987 - Kant Studien 78 (1-4):170-200.
James R. O’Shea, ed., Sellars and His Legacy, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016.James O'Shea (ed.) - 2016 - Oxford, UK:
Review of James R. O'Shea, Wilfrid Sellars: Naturalism with a Normative Turn. [REVIEW]Thomas C. Vinci - 2008 - Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2008 (4).
Sellars and His Legacy ed. by James R. O'Shea. [REVIEW]Niels Skovgaard-Olsen - 2017 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 55 (2):358-359.
Kant's analytic and synthetic judgments, and his question, how synthetic à priori judgments are possible.Shadworth H. Hodgson - 1877 - Mind 2 (5):118-122.
Wilfrid Sellars. [REVIEW]William A. Rottschaefer - 2009 - Teaching Philosophy 32 (1):96-102.

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-11-09

Downloads
66 (#239,754)

6 months
12 (#306,613)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

James O'Shea
University College Dublin

Citations of this work

Kant-Bibliographie 2019.Margit Ruffing - 2021 - Kant Studien 112 (4):623-660.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Empiricism and the philosophy of mind.Wilfrid Sellars - 1956 - Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science 1:253-329.
From Empiricism to Expressivism.Robert Brandom - 2015 - Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
The Bounds of sense. An essay on Kant's critique of pure reason.Walter H. Capps - 1969 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 29 (3):470-471.
Does Kant Demand Explanations for All Synthetic A Priori Claims?Colin Marshall - 2014 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 52 (3):549-576.

View all 22 references / Add more references