Ratio Juris 22 (4):425-454 (2009)
AbstractThe theory of principles is multifaceted. Its initial expression contained an important argument against positivist theories of adjudication. As a legal theory, it fails in its effort to claim a structural difference between rules and principles. It also fails as a methodological theory that reduces adjudication to subsumption or balancing. It misunderstands itself when it is conceived as a doctrinal theory especially of fundamental rights. Its most promising aspect could be its contribution to a more comprehensive theory of legal argumentation.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
References found in this work
Citations of this work
Resuscitation of a Phantom? On Robert Alexy’s Latest Attempt to Save His Concept of Principle.Ralf Poscher - 2020 - Ratio Juris 33 (2):134-149.
Similar books and articles
A Matter of Principle: The Principles of Quantum Theory, Dirac’s Equation, and Quantum Information.Arkady Plotnitsky - 2015 - Foundations of Physics 45 (10):1222-1268.
Restriction by Noncontraction.Elia Zardini - 2016 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 57 (2):287-327.
Theories, Principles, Policies and Common Law Adjudication.Darryn Jensen - 2011 - Australian Journal of Legal Philosophy 36:34-57.
The Methodology of Political Theory.Christian List & Laura Valentini - 2016 - In Herman Cappelen, Tamar Szabó Gendler & John Hawthorne (eds.), Oxford Handbook of Philosophical Methodology. Oxford University Press.
Critical Legal Studies and Argumentation Theory.Dale A. Herbeck - 1995 - Argumentation 9 (5):719-729.
The Logical Structure of Just War Theory.Christopher Toner - 2010 - The Journal of Ethics 14 (2):81-102.
The Possibility of Normative Jurisprudence: A Response to Brian Leiter: Alan R. Madry and Joel F. Richeimer.Alan R. Madry - 1998 - Legal Theory 4 (2):207-239.
Defending Simulation Theory Against the Argument From Error.Timothy L. Short & Kevin J. Riggs - 2016 - Mind and Language 31 (2):248-262.