Reply to professor Van de pitte

Metaphilosophy 15 (3-4):256-258 (1984)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Add categories

Keywords

Reprint years

2007

DOI

10.1111/j.1467-9973.1984.tb00660.x

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,709

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Hermeneutics and the ‘crisis’ of literature.M. M. Van de Pitte - 1984 - British Journal of Aesthetics 24 (2):99-112.
Is there a phenomenological method?M. M. Van de Pitte - 1977 - Metaphilosophy 8 (1):21-35.
On Bracketing the Epoché.M. M. Van De Pitte - 1972 - Dialogue 11 (4):535-545.
A Reply to Professor Hick.Peter van Inwagen - 1997 - Faith and Philosophy 14 (3):299-302.
Kant by William Werkmeister. [REVIEW]Frederick P. Van de Pitte - 1983 - International Studies in Philosophy 15 (3):121-123.
Husserl. [REVIEW]Margaret Van De Pitte - 1993 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 23 (3):453-476.
Is there a phenomenological method?M. M. Van de Pitte - 1977 - Metaphilosophy 8 (1):21–35.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-08-10

Downloads
14 (#986,446)

6 months
2 (#1,188,460)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Richard Schmitt
Brown University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references