In and Out of Control: Self-Augmenting and Autonomous Technique

Abstract
Martin Heidegger and Jacques Ellul propounded substantivist accounts of technology which rejected the received instrumentalist view of technology according to which only the ends to which technologies are applied can be evaluated. In opposition to instrumentalism, they claimed that modern technology involves a displacement of non-technological values or (in Heidegger’s case) other ways of relating to Being. The theory of technical autonomy that Jacques Ellul sets out in The Technological Society is distinguished from Heidegger’s brand of substantivism, however, in providing a non-transcendental, naturalistic account of the conditions under which technique displaces non-technical values in modern societies. I show how Ellul’s theory resolves into two components – 1) a theory of the essence of technique given in terms of the notion of efficiency and 2) a theory of the conditions for autonomy - and set out some criticisms of Ellul’s essentialism by way of an analysis of the concept of efficiency. I argue that component (2) is incompatible with his essentialism because it is committed to techniques being replicable across different contexts of use. I then use Jacques Derrida’s notions of iterability and generalised writing to develop a theory of technical replicability which accounts for the historical particularity of techniques and for their mechanism-dependent replicability. I support this account of technical iteration by showing how it allows explanatory connections to be made between specific mechanisms of technical replication and the fragile cultural forms or phenomenologies they support. I then use it to reformulate Ellul’s theory without its essentialist commitments and claim that the background assumptions of the resultant theory are sufficiently weak to render it plausible. However, while this supports certain aspects of Ellul’s original thesis, I argue that the modified theory no longer implies a hegemonic role for technique. While technical process may be self-augmenting and uncontrollable (much as Ellul describes it) there are no grounds for claiming that it prescribes a particular set of values.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Translate to english
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 28,756
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Técnica y cultura.Miguel Quintanilla - 1998 - Teorema: International Journal of Philosophy 17 (3):49-69.
Desacralization and the Disenchantment of the World.Daryl J. Wennemann - 1991 - Philosophy and Theology 5 (3):237-249.
The Autonomy of Technology.Jacques Ellul - 2010 - In Craig Hanks (ed.), Technology and Values: Essential Readings. West Sussex, UK: Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 67-75.
The Technological Society.Jacques Ellul - 1964 - New York: Knopf.
What's Wrong with Being a Technological Essentialist? A Response to Feenberg.Iain Thomson - 2000 - Inquiry : An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 43 (4):429 – 444.
Jacques Ellul on the Technical System and the Challenge of Christian Hope.Vincent Punzo - 1996 - Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 70:17-31.
Technology: Autonomous or Neutral.Hans Oberdiek - 1990 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 4 (1):67 – 77.
Constructivism and Technology Critique: Replies to Critics.Andrew Feenberg - 2000 - Inquiry : An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 43 (2):225 – 237.
The Technological Construction of Social Power.Philip Brey - 2008 - Social Epistemology 22 (1):71 – 95.

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2012-01-09

Total downloads

188 ( #23,932 of 2,177,988 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

2 ( #166,553 of 2,177,988 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums