Legal Theory 1 (2):179-204 (1995)

The obligation of a court to follow the law of a superior court is commonly taken to be stronger than the obligation of the higher court to respect its own precedent. The Supreme Court has recently asserted this stronger obligation in the most forceful terms. What follows is an attempt to demonstrate that this is wrong as a matter of policy and as a matter of law.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1017/S1352325200000136
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 58,242
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Is It Easy to Remain Solely an Interpretator for a Court?Egidijus Baranauskas - 2009 - Jurisprudencija: Mokslo darbu žurnalas 116 (2):201-210.
Higher Courts.Adam Potthast - 2007 - Teaching Ethics 8 (1):121-124.
Overruling a Higher Court: The Goodale Gambit and Branzburg V. Hayes.Stephen Bates - 2009 - Nexus - Chapman's Journal of Law & Policy 14:17.
Interpretation Game or How to Make Law Without Parliament.Valentinas Mikelėnas - 2009 - Jurisprudencija: Mokslo darbu žurnalas 116 (2):79-92.
Carrying Guns in Public: Legal and Public Health Implications.Jon S. Vernick - 2013 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 41 (s1):84-87.


Added to PP index

Total views
67 ( #150,784 of 2,419,597 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #542,199 of 2,419,597 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes