Callicles Refuted

In Socrates, pleasure, and value. New York: Oxford University Press (1999)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

It is of the highest importance to Plato to refute Callicles’ hedonist thesis, and for the purposes of such a refutation, he gives two arguments, which I call the argument from opposites and the argument from pleased cowards. I give a new interpretation of these arguments and show that both arguments are defensible.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,031

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-10-25

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

George Hilding Rudebusch
Northern Arizona University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references