Objectives and tasks of cochlear implantation

Abstract

At present, various hearing aids are used to improve the hearing perception of children and adults with various hearing impairments. However, not all devices can improve the effect of speech on auditory perception during use. Some hearing aids partially and partially affect the hearing of people who are unable to hear due to various technical, physiological and pathophysiological causes of various sensorineural deafness.

Categories

Add categories

Keywords

Reprint years

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,931

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

My notes

Similar books and articles

Hearing Parents’ Voices: Parental Refusal of Cochlear Implants and the Zone of Parental Discretion.Owen M. Bradfield - 2021 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 19 (1):143-150.
Some trouble with repair: Conversations between children with cochlear implants and hearing peers.Dianne Toe, Louise Paatsch & Amelia Church - 2017 - Discourse Studies 19 (1):49-68.
Cochlear Implantation, Enhancements, Transhumanism and Posthumanism: Some Human Questions.Joseph Lee - 2016 - Science and Engineering Ethics 22 (1):67-92.
Ethical dimension of paediatric cochlear implantation.Rui Nunes - 2001 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 22 (4):337-349.
Enhancement Technology and Outcomes: What Professionals and Researchers Can Learn from Those Skeptical About Cochlear Implants. [REVIEW]Patrick Kermit - 2012 - Health Care Analysis 20 (4):367-384.
Das hören des Cochlea Implantats.Robert Stock & Beate Ochsner - 2014 - Paragrana: Internationale Zeitschrift für Historische Anthropologie 22 (3):408-424.
Worlds of Difference.Marcel Broesterhuizen - 2008 - Ethical Perspectives 15 (1):103-131.
Ethical Issues in Cochlear Implant Surgery: An Exploration into Disease, Disability, and the Best Interests of the Child.Michael A. Grodin & Harlan L. Lane - 1997 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 7 (3):231-251.
Precarious Plasticity: Neuropolitics, Cochlear Implants, and the Redefinition of Deafness.Laura Mauldin - 2014 - Science, Technology, and Human Values 39 (1):130-153.
A dominantly inherited progressive deafness affecting distal auditory nerve and hair cells.A. Starr, B. Isaacson, H. J. Michalewski, F. G. Zeng, Y. Y. Kong, P. Beale, G. W. Paulson, B. J. B. Keats & M. M. Lesperance - unknown
Medical and bioethical considerations in elective cochlear implant array removal.Maryanna S. Owoc, Elliott D. Kozin, Aaron Remenschneider, Maria J. Duarte, Ariel Edward Hight, Marjorie Clay, Susanna E. Meyer, Daniel J. Lee & Selena Briggs - 2018 - Journal of Medical Ethics 44 (3):174-179.
To Have an Ear: Music and the Otological Experience.Atia Sattar - 2016 - Journal of Medical Humanities 37 (3):289-298.
Cochlear implants and the claims of culture? A response to Lane and Grodin.Dena S. Davis - 1997 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 7 (3):253-258.
Choosing for the child with cochlear implants: a note of precaution. [REVIEW]Patrick Kermit - 2010 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 13 (2):157-167.
Speech-in-Noise Perception in Children With Cochlear Implants, Hearing Aids, Developmental Language Disorder and Typical Development: The Effects of Linguistic and Cognitive Abilities.Janne von Koss Torkildsen, Abigail Hitchins, Marte Myhrum & Ona Bø Wie - 2019 - Frontiers in Psychology 10.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-09-01

Downloads
3 (#1,726,395)

6 months
3 (#1,044,897)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references