Social science and the philosophy of law

In John Tasioulas (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to the Philosophy of Law. New York, NY, USA: Cambridge University Press (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 94,045

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Schauer on the Differentiation of Law.Lars Vinx - 2016 - In Nicoletta Ladavac & Christoph Bezemek (eds.), The Force of Law Reaffirmed: Frederick Schauer Meets the Critics. Cham: Springer Verlag.
Designing judicial review: A comment on Schauer.Emily Sherwin - 2003 - Law and Philosophy 22 (s 3-4):241-246.
Frederick Schauer: The Force of Law. [REVIEW]Lando Kirchmair - 2020 - Archiv für Rechts- und Sozialphilosophie 106 (1):133-140.
Incomplete Responses.Frederick Schauer - 2016 - In Nicoletta Ladavac & Christoph Bezemek (eds.), The Force of Law Reaffirmed: Frederick Schauer Meets the Critics. Cham: Springer Verlag.
Frederick Schauer: The Force of Law. [REVIEW]Matthias Bau - 2018 - Archiv für Rechts- und Sozialphilosophie 104 (4):595-598.
The Cambridge Companion to the Philosophy of Law.John Tasioulas (ed.) - 2020 - New York, NY, USA: Cambridge University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-12-02

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references