The apparent length of tilted lines

, &
Journal of Experimental Psychology 39 (4):548 (1949)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Add categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1037/h0060386

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,069

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Perceived length depends on exposure duration: Straight lines and Muller-Lyer stimuli.Albert Erlebacher & Robert Sekuler - 1974 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 103 (4):724.
Adaptation, after-effect and contrast in the perception of tilted lines. I. Quantitative studies.J. J. Gibson & M. Radner - 1937 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 20 (5):453.
Adaptation, after-effect, and contrast in the perception of tilted lines. II. Simultaneous contrast and the areal restriction of the after-effect. [REVIEW]J. J. Gibson - 1937 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 20 (6):553.
Influence of frame size on apparent length of a line.Theodor M. Künnapas - 1955 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 50 (3):168.
The retention of the ability to draw lines of a given length blindfold.E. O. Bregman, E. L. Thorndike & E. Woodyard - 1943 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 33 (1):78.
Influence of word frequency and length on the apparent duration of tachistoscopic presentations.Joel S. Warm & Ronald E. McCray - 1969 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 79 (1p1):56.
Apparent length as a function of tilt does not depend on orientation of the standard.Martha Teghtsoonian - 1972 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 94 (2):191.
Effects of sight of the body and active locomotion in perceptual adaptation.Donald Quinlan - 1970 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 86 (1):91.
Magnitude estimation of average length and average inclination.Arthur L. Miller & Richard Sheldon - 1969 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 81 (1):16.
The apparent magnitude of number scaled by random production.William P. Banks & David K. Hill - 1974 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 102 (2):353.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-22

Downloads
17 (#896,285)

6 months
5 (#710,385)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references