On the Kleene degrees of Π 1 1 sets

Journal of Symbolic Logic 51 (2):352-359 (1986)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Let A and B be subsets of the reals. Say that A κ ≥ B, if there is a real a such that the relation "x ∈ B" is uniformly Δ 1 (a, A) in L[ ω x,a,A 1 , x,a,A]. This reducibility induces an equivalence relation $\equiv_\kappa$ on the sets of reals; the $\equiv_\kappa$ -equivalence class of a set is called its Kleene degree. Let K be the structure that consists of the Kleene degrees and the induced partial order K ≥. A substructure of K that is of interest is P, the Kleene degrees of the Π 1 1 sets of reals. If sharps exist, then there is not much to P, as Steel [9] has shown that the existence of sharps implies that P has only two elements: the degree of the empty set and the degree of the complete Π 1 1 set. Legrand [4] used the hypothesis that there is a real whose sharp does not exist to show that there are incomparable elements in P; in the context of V = L, Hrbacek has shown that P is dense and has no minimal pairs. The Hrbacek results led Simpson [6] to make the following conjecture: if V = L, then p forms a universal homogeneous upper semilattice with 0 and 1. Simpson's conjecture is shown to be false by showing that if V = L, then Godel's maximal thin Π 1 1 set is the infimum of two strictly larger elements of P. The second main result deals with the notion of jump in K. Let A' be the complete Kleene enumerable set relative to A. Say that A is low-n if A (n) has the same degree as $\varnothing^{(n)}$ , and A is high-n if A (n) has the same degree as $\varnothing^{(n + 1)}$ . Simpson and Weitkamp [7] have shown that there is a high (high-1) incomplete Π 1 1 set in L. They have also shown that various other Π 1 1 sets are neither high nor low in L. Legrand [5] extended their results by showing that, if there is a real x such that x # does not exist, then there is an element of P that, for all n, is neither low-n nor high-n. In § 2, ZFC is used to show that, for all n, if A is Π 1 1 and low-n then A is Borel. The proof uses a strengthened version of Jensen's theorem on sequences of admissible ordinals that appears in [7, Simpson-Weitkamp]

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,031

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

On sets not belonging to algebras.L. Š Grinblat - 2007 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 72 (2):483-500.
Monotone reducibility and the family of infinite sets.Douglas Cenzer - 1984 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 49 (3):774-782.
Isolation in the CEA hierarchy.Geoffrey LaForte - 2005 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 44 (2):227-244.
Exact equiconsistency results for Δ 3 1 -sets of reals.Haim Judah - 1992 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 32 (2):101-112.
Substitution and truth in quantum logic.Itamar Pitowsky - 1982 - Philosophy of Science 49 (3):380-401.
Trees and Π 1 1 -Subsets of ω1 ω 1.Alan Mekler & Jouko Vaananen - 1993 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 58 (3):1052 - 1070.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
69 (#242,601)

6 months
23 (#124,770)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references