Analysis 66 (3):248–255 (2006)

Authors
Jonathan Wolff
Oxford University
Abstract
In a paper published in this journal we proposed a method for resolving disputed land claims between two parties (Steiner and Wolff: 2003). In essence the proposal is to hold an auction between the disputants in which the land is given to the higher bidder, but the receipts of the auction to the under-bidder. We claimed that under such circumstances both parties can walk away happy: the higher bidder happy to pay the price bid for the land; the under-bidder happier to have the receipts of the auction when the alternative is to pay for the land at a higher price.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/j.1467-8284.2006.00622.x
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 70,079
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

The Greening of Heart and Mind: A Love Story.Roman Briggs - 2009 - Environmental Ethics 31 (2):155-168.
Liberal Egalitarianism and Workfare.Paul Bou-Habib & Serena Olsaretti - 2004 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 21 (3):257-270.
Ethically Evaluating Land Art: Is It Worth It?Sheila Lintott - 2007 - Ethics, Place and Environment 10 (3):263 – 277.
Agriculture, Ethics, and Restrictions on Property Rights.Kristin S. Shrader-Frechette - 1988 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 1 (1):21-40.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
169 ( #69,310 of 2,506,021 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #416,828 of 2,506,021 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes