Disputed land claims: A response to Weatherson and to bou-Habib and Olsaretti

Analysis 66 (3):248–255 (2006)
Abstract
In a paper published in this journal we proposed a method for resolving disputed land claims between two parties (Steiner and Wolff: 2003). In essence the proposal is to hold an auction between the disputants in which the land is given to the higher bidder, but the receipts of the auction to the under-bidder. We claimed that under such circumstances both parties can walk away happy: the higher bidder happy to pay the price bid for the land; the under-bidder happier to have the receipts of the auction when the alternative is to pay for the land at a higher price.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/j.1467-8284.2006.00622.x
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 30,300
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
The Greening of Heart and Mind: A Love Story.Roman Briggs - 2009 - Environmental Ethics 31 (2):155-168.
Agriculture, Ethics, and Restrictions on Property Rights.Kristin S. Shrader-Frechette - 1988 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 1 (1):21-40.
Ethically Evaluating Land Art: Is It Worth It?Sheila Lintott - 2007 - Ethics, Place and Environment 10 (3):263 – 277.
Liberal Egalitarianism and Workfare.Paul Bou-Habib & Serena Olsaretti - 2004 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 21 (3):257-270.
Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total downloads
158 ( #30,532 of 2,193,232 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #290,647 of 2,193,232 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature