An Interpretation of Aristotle's Notion of Happiness in the "Nicomachean Ethics"

Dissertation, Vanderbilt University (1982)

Abstract
In this dissertation I shall develop and defend an interpretation of Aristotle's notion of happiness. I argue that Aristotle presents a single account of happiness as an encompassing end. Most current interpretators of the Nicomachean Ethics think that Aristotle has at least two incompatible views of happiness. On one view, it is an end that includes or encompasses other ends so that happiness involves engaging in numerous activities. On the other view, it is a single activity, contemplation, that excludes other activities. By a close analysis of books I and X of the Nicomachean Ethics, I show that Aristotle leaves no room for one to use this exclusive end view in order to understand his notion of happiness. I argue that happiness can be only an encompassing end. Happiness on my view involves the exercise of both the intellectual and moral virtues, and not merely the exercise of philosophical wisdom in contemplation. Fundamental to this interpretation is an understanding of Aristotle's notion of activity. The basic features of activity provide guidelines for resolving some of the difficulties that seem inherent in Aristotle's account of happiness as an activity in accordance with virtue. Three basic features of activity are crucial in its role in the Nicomachean Ethics: an activity is an end, an activity is the actualization of a potentiality, and an activity may encompass other actions or activities. Aristotle's arguments that happiness, the final end of human action, is an activity can be sustained only by reference to his rich conception of activity. Moreover, it is his conception of activity that allows one positively to reject the exclusive end view of happiness that has repeatedly been attributed to Aristotle in the past. I conclude that though contemplation may be the best constituent activity of happiness, it cannot be the whole of happiness. Human happiness encompasses both the exercise of reason and active participation in the social and political world
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 65,605
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Divine and Human Happiness in Nicomachean Ethics.Stephen S. Bush - 2008 - Philosophical Review 117 (1):49-75.
Cooper on Ancient Ethics.R. Heinaman - 2000 - Polis 17 (1-2):161-185.
Intrinsically Valued Parts of Happiness.Nicholas White - 1999 - History of Philosophy & Logical Analysis 2:149.
Aristotle's Nicomachean Ethics: On Pleasure.Yun Zhang - 2002 - Philosophy and Culture 29 (5):469-484.
Aristotle's Concept of Happiness in the 13th Century.Anthony John Celano - 1980 - Dissertation, University of Toronto (Canada)
On the Eudemian and Nicomachean Conceptions of Eudaimonia.Roopen Majithia - 2005 - American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 79 (3):365-388.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2015-02-06

Total views
1 ( #1,515,283 of 2,461,780 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #448,599 of 2,461,780 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.

My notes