Changing Lenses: A Look at Bond 007 Films

Iamure International Journal of Literature, Philosophy and Religion 4 (1) (2013)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The preponderance of female stereotypes in various films has become intense. Regardless of film genre, its effect on media-saturated culture has become somehow profound. This has become a concern to many people especially to feminists. Hence, this film study is conducted to explore how the female lead characters are stereotyped in films particularly in select official James Bond 007 films. During the analysis, the researcher utilizes an adapted film analysis rubric. The results show that: 1) the leading female characters in the three films analyzed are portrayed mainly as objects of Bond’s sexual desire while he establishes and maintains a chauvinistic role all throughout each film; 2) Bond engages in dualistic relationships with the lead female characters when he uses them to satisfy his own desires for a woman as a means to an end (as particularly exemplified and portrayed in the character of Countess Lisl in For Your Eyes Only); 3) the treatment of some female stereotypes in the three films analyzed is consistent, e.g. a particular stereotype of a lead female character as object of sexual desire is sustained all throughout the film. The study, therefore, concludes that the lead female characters in the select films are generally portrayed in oppressive stereotypes. Keywords: Mass Communication, lead female character, female stereotypes, James Bond007, descriptive design (qualitative film analysis), Philippines

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,846

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Existential Themes in the Films of Alfred Hitchcock.Sander H. Lee - 1985 - Philosophy Research Archives 11:225-244.
Ariadne at the movies.John Dilworth - 2003 - Contemporary Aesthetics 1.
What do we see in film?Robert Hopkins - 2008 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 66 (2):149–159.
New York Film Festival 2004.Martha P. Nochimson - 2004 - Film-Philosophy 8 (2).
A festival of facts.Krister Segerberg - 1994 - Logic and Logical Philosophy 2 (5):7-22.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-01-12

Downloads
7 (#1,385,962)

6 months
1 (#1,469,946)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references