Philosophical reflection of the idea of the game

Abstract

This article implements a philosophical understanding of the concept of the game. The classification of a game phenomenon with a multi-valued value is presented. The scientific and theoretical interpretations of the game are critically analyzed, and at the same time, on the basis of their acceptance of the heuristic side, a philosophical definition of the game is presented.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,931

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Similar books and articles

Reflection of Long Game Formulas.Heikki Heikkilä & Jouko Väänänen - 1994 - Mathematical Logic Quarterly 40 (3):381-392.
Chess is Not a Game.Deborah P. Vossen - 2008 - In Benjamin Hale (ed.), Philosophy Looks at Chess. Chicago and La Salle, Illinois: Open Court Press. pp. 191-208.
Game-players and game-playing: a response to kreider.Richard Royce - 2013 - Journal of the Philosophy of Sport 40 (2):225-239.
Game Theory: A Preliminary Exploration.Chang Hui-Liang & Tzu-Chia Yeh - 2006 - Philosophy and Culture 33 (3):165-181.
Another Rawls Game.Gregg Lubritz - 1999 - Teaching Philosophy 22 (3):275-280.
The Definition of 'Game'.M. W. Rowe - 1992 - Philosophy 67 (262):467 - 479.
Equilibrium and Rationality. [REVIEW]Robert Sugden - 2001 - Philosophical Review 110 (3):425-427.
On being part of a game.Alex Wolf-Root - 2019 - Journal of the Philosophy of Sport 47 (1):75-88.
Game Theoretic Pragmatics.Michael Franke - 2013 - Philosophy Compass 8 (3):269-284.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-09-01

Downloads
2 (#1,816,571)

6 months
1 (#1,512,999)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references