If consciousness is dynamically relevant, artificial intelligence isn't conscious

Abstract

We demonstrate that if consciousness is relevant for the temporal evolution of a system's states—that is, if it is dynamically relevant—then AI systems cannot be conscious. That is because AI systems run on CPUs, GPUs, TPUs or other processors which have been designed and verified to adhere to computational dynamics that systematically preclude or suppress deviations. The design and verification preclude or suppress, in particular, potential consciousness-related dynamical effects, so that if consciousness is dynamically relevant, AI systems cannot be conscious.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-04-11

Downloads
500 (#45,597)

6 months
194 (#20,956)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Johannes Kleiner
Ludwig Maximilians Universität, München

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Consciousness and Fundamental Reality.Philip Goff - 2017 - New York, USA: Oup Usa.
Is consciousness a brain process.Ullin T. Place - 1956 - British Journal of Psychology 47 (1):44-50.
Modeling Mental Qualities.Andrew Y. Lee - 2021 - The Philosophical Review 130 (2):263-209.

View all 8 references / Add more references