Reply to professor Puccetti

British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 13 (49):53-54 (1962)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,127

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Reply to professor Puccetti.R. W. Sperry - 1977 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 2 (2):145-146.
WATKINS, J. W. N.: "Hobbes's system of ideas". [REVIEW]R. F. Kahn - 1965 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 43:421.
In Defence of the Baldwin Effect: A Reply to Watkins.J. DuprÉ - 2000 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 51 (3):477-479.
Between Analytic and Empirical, by J. W. N. Watkins. [REVIEW]David Kaplan - 1967 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 32 (2):246-249.
Discussion. In defence of the Baldwin effect: a reply to Watkins.John Dupré - 2000 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 51 (3):477-479.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
4 (#1,644,260)

6 months
1 (#1,516,603)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references