Why deceived systems do not need to be cognitive. Reply to Artiga.

Abstract

Presented at the international conference "Green Intelligence? - Debating Plant Cognition" in Basle, Switzerland on October 23th 2021. A critical reply to Marc Artiga, Communication and Deception in Plants. Objecting to Artiga's arguments in favor of Plant Cognitivism, I try to show why deception does not imply cognitive or representational (contentful) states. Sensory detectors or communication channels in plants, simpler animals or artificial sensory systems do not need to display a perspective on the world to be tricked. Correlational failure and hard-wired response mechanisms can suffice. Furthermore, I offer a sketch of an explanatory understanding of content in terms of objectivity, arguing against the dominant overgeneralization of representation in terms of functional information-use. (© Adrian Wieczorek)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,682

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-01-24

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references