Differential GSR conditioning of true and false decisions

Journal of Experimental Psychology 86 (1):13 (1970)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1037/h0029973

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,846

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Differential eyelid conditioning as a function of the CS-UCS interval.Thomas F. Hartman & David A. Grant - 1962 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 64 (2):131.
Transfer of training from differential classical to differential instrumental conditioning.Milton A. Trapold, George W. Lawton & Robert A. Dick - 1968 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 76 (4p1):568.
Differential GSR conditioning as a function of the CS-UCS interval.H. D. Kimmel & H. S. Pennypacker - 1963 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 65 (6):559.
Differential conditioning and intensity of the UCS.W. N. Runquist, K. W. Spence & D. W. Stubbs - 1958 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 55 (1):51.
Differential Resistance to Extinction Determined by a Small Number of Differential Instrumental Conditioning Trials.James R. Ison & Allen A. Adinolfi - 1968 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 77 (2):350.
A contrast effect in differential conditioning.Gordon H. Bower - 1961 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 62 (2):196.
Mmountains are just mountains.Jay Garfield - 2009 - In Mario D'Amato, Jay L. Garfield & Tom J. F. Tillemans (eds.), Pointing at the Moon: Buddhism, Logic, Analytic Philosophy. Oxford University Press. pp. 71--82.
Differential eyelid conditioning based on opposing instrumental contingencies.Suzanne E. Kwaterski & John W. Moore - 1969 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 79 (3p1):547.
Induction in differential instrumental conditioning.James R. Ison & Richard V. Krane - 1969 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 80 (1):183.
Arithmetic correctness as the discriminandum in classical and differential eyelid conditioning.Robert A. Fleming, David A. Grant & Jane A. North - 1968 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 77 (2):286.
Effects of nonreward in S+ and S- on performance in differential conditioning.James H. McHose, Frederick R. Maxwell & Earl R. McHewitt - 1971 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 88 (2):282.
"Appropriateness" of the stimulus-reinforcement contingency in instrumental differential conditioning of the eyelid response to the arithmetic concepts of "right" and "wrong".Robert A. Fleming, Louise E. Cerekwicki & David A. Grant - 1968 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 77 (2):295.
Differential eyelid conditioning: Establishing differential responding prior to varying the probability of reinforcement.Frederick L. Newman & Julian Woodhouse - 1969 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 80 (1):146.
An investigation of conditions determining contrast effects in differential reward conditioning.H. Wayne Ludvigson & Robert A. Gay - 1967 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 75 (1):37.
Response topography in the acquisition of differential eyelid conditioning.Michael J. Zajano & David A. Grant - 1974 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 103 (6):1115.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-22

Downloads
10 (#1,192,632)

6 months
1 (#1,469,946)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references