Resistance to extinction as a function of reinforcement schedule: A within-subject design

, &
Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 5 (2):180-182 (1975)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.3758/bf03333242

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,783

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Resistance to extinction as a function of reinforcement schedule and amount of reinforcement.A. Grant Young, W. R. Favret & P. M. Blakney - 1976 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 7 (3):313-314.
Resistance to extinction as a function of partial reinforcement and bar weighting: A within-S design.A. Grant Young - 1969 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 79 (2p1):363.
Resistance to extinction as a function of partial reinforcement and external stimuli: A within- S design.A. Grant Young & C. A. Costelloe - 1974 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 3 (3):191-192.
Extinction as a function of the order of partial and consistent reinforcement.N. S. Sutherland, N. J. Mackintosh & J. B. Wolfe - 1965 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 69 (1):56.
Resistance to extinction as a function of age and schedules of reinforcement.Norman Kass - 1962 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 64 (3):249.
Resistance to extinction as a function of the amount of reinforcement present during acquisition.Bradley Reynolds - 1950 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 40 (1):46.
Some effects of observing a model's reinforcement schedule and rate of responding on extinction and response rate.Betty L. Borden & Glenn M. White - 1973 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 97 (1):41.
Resistance to extinction as a function of the fixed ratio.John J. Boren - 1961 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 61 (4):304.
A "partial reinforcement extinction effect" in perceptual-motor performance: Coerced versus volunteer subject populations.Roger W. Black, Joseph Schumpert & Frances Welch - 1972 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 92 (1):143.
Resistance to extinction as a function of percentage of reinforcement, number of training trials, and conditioned reinforcement.Norman Kass & Helen Wilson - 1966 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 71 (3):355.
Operant extinction as a function of the extinction schedule.Donald H. Bullock - 1951 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 42 (6):437.
Resistance to extinction as a function of incentive, percentage of reinforcement, and number of nonreinforced trials.Charles N. Uhl & A. Grant Young - 1967 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 73 (4p1):556.
Resistance to extinction at spaced trials using the within-subject procedure.Roger L. Mellgren & Jeffrey A. Seybert - 1973 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 100 (1):151.
Resistance to extinction when continuous reinforcement is followed by partial reinforcement.David Hothersall - 1966 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 72 (1):109.
Frustration effect and resistance to extinction as a function of percentage of reinforcement.Richard Coughlin Jr - 1970 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 84 (1):113.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-01-22

Downloads
29 (#548,607)

6 months
3 (#965,065)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

A within-S test of the response specificity of the PRE.A. Grant Young, P. A. Hale & G. D. Fuselier - 1974 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 3 (6):437-439.

Add more references