Linked bibliography for the SEP article "Henricus Regius" by Desmond Clarke and Erik-Jan Bos

This is an automatically generated and experimental page

If everything goes well, this page should display the bibliography of the aforementioned article as it appears in the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, but with links added to PhilPapers records and Google Scholar for your convenience. Some bibliographies are not going to be represented correctly or fully up to date. In general, bibliographies of recent works are going to be much better linked than bibliographies of primary literature and older works. Entries with PhilPapers records have links on their titles. A green link indicates that the item is available online at least partially.

This experiment has been authorized by the editors of the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. The original article and bibliography can be found here.

Works by Regius

  • 1640a. Disputatio medico-physiologica pro sanguinis circulatione, Utrecht: Aeg. Roman; reprinted in AT III, 727–34.
  • 1640b. Spongia qua eluuntur sordes Animadversionum, quas Jacobus Primirosius, Doctor Medicus, adversus Theses pro Circulatione sanguinis in Academia Ultrajectina disputatas nuper edidit, Leiden: W. Christiaens. [Available online.]
  • 1641a. Physiologia, sive Cognitio sanitatis. Tribus disputationibus in Academia Ultrajectina publice proposita, Utrecht: Aeg. Roman; reprinted in Bos 2002, 195–248.
  • 1641b. Disputatio medica prima [–tertia] De illustribus aliquot quaestionibus physiologicis, Utrecht: Aeg. Roman.
  • 1642. Responsio, sive Notae in Appendicem ad Corollaria Theologico-Philosophica Viri Reverendi et Celeberrimi D. Gisberti Voetii, SS. Theologiae Doctoris et Professoris, et in Academiâ Ultrajectina p.t. Rectoris Magnifici, verbique Divini in Ecclesia Ministri, Utrecht: J. van Doorn. [Available online.]
  • 1646. Fundamenta physices, Amsterdam: L. Elsevier. [Available online.]
  • 1647a. Fundamenta medica, Utrecht: Th. van Ackersdijck. [Available online.]
  • 1647b. Medicatio viri cachexia leucophlegmatica affecti. Corollaria, Utrecht: J. van Noortdyck.
  • 1648. Brevis explicatio mentis humanae, sive animae rationalis: ubi explicatur, quid sit, & quid esse possit, Utrecht: Th. van Ackersdijck and G. van Zijll. [Available online.]
  • 1650. De Affectibus animi dissertatio, Utrecht: Th. van Ackersdijck. [Available online.]
  • 1654. Philosophia naturalis, Amsterdam: L. Elsevier (2nd enlarged edn. of Regius 1646). [Available online.]
  • 1657. Brevis explicatio mentis humanae, sive animae rationalis: antea publico examini proposita, et deinde operâ Henrici Regii Ultrajectini nonnihil dilucidata, et à notis Cartesii vindicata, Utrecht: Th. van Ackersdijck and G. van Zijll (2nd enlarged edn. of Regius 1648). [Available online.]
  • 1661a. Philosophia naturalis, Amsterdam: L. and D. Elsevier (3rd edn. of Regius 1646). [Available online.]
  • 1661b. Epistola Henrici Regii ad V. Cl. Clerselierum JCtum Parisiensem, Utrecht: Th. van Ackersdijck and G. van Zijll. [Available online.]
  • 1687. Philosophie naturelle, Utrecht: R. van Zyll (French translation of Regius 1661a). [Available online.]

See also Erik-Jan Bos (ed.), The Correspondence between Descartes and Henricus Regius, Utrecht: ZENO, The Leiden-Utrecht Research Institute of Philosophy, 2002. This includes significant changes to the correspondence as published in Descartes 1964–76. [Available online.]

Related Early Works

  • Andreae, Tobias, 1653. Brevis Replicatio Reposita Brevi Explicationi Mentis Humanae, sive animae Rationalis, D. Henrici Regii, Medici ac Philosophi Ultrajectini, Amsterdam: L. Elzevier. [Available online.] (Scholar)
  • Descartes, René, 1648. Notae in Programma quoddam, sub finem Anni 1647 in Belgio editum, cum hoc titulo: Explicatio Mentis humanae, sive Animae rationalis, ubi explicatur quid sit, & quid esse posset, Amsterdam: L. Elzevier. (Scholar)
  • Descartes, René, [AT]. Oeuvres de Descartes, revised edition., Ch. Adam and P. Tannery (eds.), 12 volumes. Paris: Vrin/CNRS, 1964–76.
  • Descartes, René, [CB]. Descartes’ Conversation with Burman, trans. J. Cottingham. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1976. (Scholar)
  • Descartes, René, The Correspondence of René Descartes 1643, T. Verbeek, E.-J. Bos, and J. van de Ven (eds.), Utrecht: Zeno Institute of Philosophy, 2003. [This is the first volume of a projected complete edition of Descartes’ correspondence.] [Available online.] (Scholar)
  • Medical Dissertations 1636–60, A compilation at the British Library in which some of Regius’ disputations are bound. (Scholar)
  • Schoock, Martinus, 1643. Admiranda Methodus novae philosophiae Renati des Cartes, Utrecht: J. van Waesberge. [Available online.] French trans. in Verbeek 1988, 157–320. (Scholar)
  • Voetius, Gisbertus, 1648–69. Selectarum Disputationum Theologicarum, 5 volumes, Utrecht and Amsterdam: J. van Waesberge. (Scholar)

Modern works

  • Alexandru, Vlad, 2013. ‘Regius and Gassendi on the Human Soul,’ Intellectual History Review, 23: 1–20. (Scholar)
  • Bitbol-Herpéries, Annie, 1993. ‘Descartes et Regius: leur pensée médicale,’ in Verbeek 1993, 47–68. (Scholar)
  • Bellis, Delphine, 2013. ‘Empiricism without Metaphysics: Regius’ Cartesian Natural Philosophy,’ in Cartesian Empiricisms, M. Dobre and T. Nyden (eds.), Dordrecht: Springer, 151–83. (Scholar)
  • Bos, Erik-Jan, 1999. ‘Descartes’s Lettre Apologétique aux Magistrats d’Utrecht: New Facts and Materials,’ Journal of the History of Philosophy, 37: 415–33. (Scholar)
  • –––, 2013. ‘Henricus Regius et les limites de la philosophie Cartésienne,’ in Qu’est-ce qu’être cartésien?, D. Kolesnik-Antoine (ed.), Lyon: ENS Editions. (Scholar)
  • –––, 2015. ‘Regius and the diffusion of Cartesianism in the early 1640s –– and beyond’,’ in Les Pays-Bas aux XVIIe et XVIIIe siècles: Nouveaux regards, C. Secretan and D. Antoine-Mahut (eds.), Paris: Champion. (Scholar)
  • –––, 2017. ‘Descartes and Regius on the Pineal Gland and Animal Spirits, and A Letter of Regius on the True Seat of the Soul,’ in Gaukroger and Wilson 2017, 95–111. (Scholar)
  • Clarke, Desmond M., 2006. Descartes: A Biography, New York: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
  • –––, 2010. ‘The Physics and Metaphysics of the Mind: Descartes and Regius,’ in Mind, Method, and Morality: Essays in Honour of Anthony Kenny, J. Cottingham and P. Hacker (eds.), Oxford: Oxford University Press, 187–207. (Scholar)
  • –––, 2011. ‘Hypotheses,’ in The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy in Early Modern Europe, D. Clarke and C. Wilson (eds.), Oxford: Oxford University Press, 249–71. (Scholar)
  • Farina, Paolo, 1975. ‘Sulla formazione scientifica di H. Regius: Santorio e il ‘De statica medicina’,’ Rivista Critica de Storia della Filosofia, 33: 363–99. (Scholar)
  • Fowler, Colin F., 1999. Descartes on the Human Soul. Philosophy and the Demands of Christian Doctrine, Dordrecht: Kluwer. (Scholar)
  • Gariepy, Thomas P., 1991. Mechanism without Metaphysics: Henricus Regius and the Establishment of Cartesian Medicine, PhD dissertation, Yale University, New Haven: Yale University. (Scholar)
  • Gaukroger, Stephen, and Catherine Wilson (eds.), 2017. Descartes and Cartesianism: Essays in Honour of Desmond Clarke, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
  • Hallyn, Ferdinand, 2005. ‘La Philosophia naturalis de Regius et l’écriture athée,’ Libertinage et philosophie au XVIIe siècle, 9: 37–46. (Scholar)
  • Kolesnik-Antoine, Delphine, 2013. ‘Le rôle des expériences dans la physiologie d’Henricus Regius: les ‘pierres lydiennes’ du cartésianisme’, Journal of Early Modern Studies, 1: 125–45. (Scholar)
  • Olivo, Gilles, 1993. ‘L’homme en personne,’ in Verbeek 1993, 69–91.
  • Schmalz, Tad M., 1997. ‘Descartes on innate ideas, sensation, and scholasticism: The response to Regius,’ Oxford Studies in the History of Philosophy, 2: 33–73. (Scholar)
  • –––, 2017. Early Modern Cartesianisms: Dutch and French Constructions, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
  • –––, 2018. ‘The Curious Case of Henricus Regius,’ in The Oxford Handbook of Descartes and Cartesianism, S. Nadler, T.M. Schmaltz, and D. Antoine-Mahut (eds.), Oxford: Oxford University Press, 434–49. (Scholar)
  • Verbeek, Theo, 1988. La Querelle d’Utrecht, Paris: Les impressions nouvelles. (Scholar)
  • –––, 1992. Descartes and the Dutch: Early Reactions to Cartesian Philosophy, 1637–1650, Carbondale and Edwardsville: Southern Illinois University Press. (Scholar)
  • ––– (ed.), 1993. Descartes et Regius: Autour de l’Explication de l’esprit humain, Amsterdam-Atlanta: Rodopi. (Scholar)
  • –––, 1994. ‘Regius’s Fundamenta Physices,’ Journal of the History of Ideas, 55: 533–51. (Scholar)
  • –––, 2000. ‘The Invention of Nature: Descartes and Regius,’ in Descartes’ Natural Philosophy, S. Gaukroger, J. Shuster and J. Sutton (eds.), London and New York: Routledge, 149–67. (Scholar)
  • –––, 2016. ‘Henricus Regius (Hendrik de Roy) (1598-1679),’ in The Cambridge Descartes Lexicon, L. Nolan (ed.), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 641–44. (Scholar)
  • –––, 2017. ‘Regius and Descartes on the Passions,’ in Gaukroger and Wilson 2017, 164–76. (Scholar)
  • Vrijer, M.J.A. de, 1917. Henricus Regius: Een ‘cartesiaansch’ hoogleraar aan de Utrechtsche hoogeschool, The Hague: Nijhoff. (Scholar)
  • Wilson, Catherine, 2000. ‘Descartes and the Corporeal Mind: Some Implications of the Regius Affair,’ in Descartes’ Natural Philosophy, S. Gaukroger et al. (eds.), London and New York: Routledge, 659–79. (Scholar)

Generated Fri Aug 14 15:28:54 2020