Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. The third and fourth international competitions on computational models of argumentation: Design, results and analysis.Stefano Bistarelli, Lars Kotthoff, Jean-Marie Lagniez, Emmanuel Lonca, Jean-Guy Mailly, Julien Rossit, Francesco Santini & Carlo Taticchi - forthcoming - Argument and Computation:1-73.
    The International Competition on Computational Models of Argumentation (ICCMA) focuses on reasoning tasks in abstract argumentation frameworks. Submitted solvers are tested on a selected collection of benchmark instances, including artificially generated argumentation frameworks and some frameworks formalizing real-world problems. This paper presents the novelties introduced in the organization of the Third (2019) and Fourth (2021) editions of the competition. In particular, we proposed new tracks to competitors, one dedicated to dynamic solvers (i.e., solvers that incrementally compute solutions of frameworks obtained (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Incremental computation for structured argumentation over dynamic DeLP knowledge bases.Gianvincenzo Alfano, Sergio Greco, Francesco Parisi, Gerardo I. Simari & Guillermo R. Simari - 2021 - Artificial Intelligence 300 (C):103553.
    Structured argumentation systems, and their implementation, represent an important research subject in the area of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning. Structured argumentation advances over abstract argumentation frameworks by providing the internal construction of the arguments that are usually defined by a set of (strict and defeasible) rules. By considering the structure of arguments, it becomes possible to analyze reasons for and against a conclusion, and the warrant status of such a claim in the context of a knowledge base represents the main (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Initial sets in abstract argumentation frameworks.Yuming Xu & Claudette Cayrol - 2018 - Journal of Applied Non-Classical Logics 28 (2-3):260-279.
    Dung’s abstract argumentation provides us with a general framework to deal with argumentation, non-monotonic reasoning and logic programming. For the extension-based semantics, one of the basic principles is I-maximality which is in particular related with the notion of skeptical justification. Another one is directionality which can be employed for the study of dynamics of argumentation. In this paper, we introduce two new extension-based semantics into Dung’s abstract argumentation, called grounded-like semantics and initial semantics which satisfy the I-maximality and directionality principles. (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • A principle-based robustness analysis of admissibility-based argumentation semantics.Tjitze Rienstra, Chiaki Sakama, Leendert van der Torre & Beishui Liao - 2020 - Argument and Computation 11 (3):305-339.
    The principle-based approach is a methodology to classify and analyse argumentation semantics. In this paper we classify seven of the main alternatives for argumentation semantics using a set of new robustness principles. These principles complement Baroni and Giacomin’s original classification and deal with the behaviour of a semantics when the argumentation framework changes due to the addition or removal of an attack between two arguments. We distinguish so-called persistence principles and monotonicity principles, where the former deal with the question of (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Constraints and changes: A survey of abstract argumentation dynamics.Sylvie Doutre & Jean-Guy Mailly - 2018 - Argument and Computation 9 (3):223-248.
  • A general notion of equivalence for abstract argumentation.Ringo Baumann, Wolfgang Dvořák, Thomas Linsbichler & Stefan Woltran - 2019 - Artificial Intelligence 275 (C):379-410.
  • Acceptance in incomplete argumentation frameworks.Dorothea Baumeister, Matti Järvisalo, Daniel Neugebauer, Andreas Niskanen & Jörg Rothe - 2021 - Artificial Intelligence 295 (C):103470.
  • On the Input/Output behavior of argumentation frameworks.Pietro Baroni, Guido Boella, Federico Cerutti, Massimiliano Giacomin, Leendert van der Torre & Serena Villata - 2014 - Artificial Intelligence 217 (C):144-197.
  • A general semi-structured formalism for computational argumentation: Definition, properties, and examples of application.Pietro Baroni, Massimiliano Giacomin & Beishui Liao - 2018 - Artificial Intelligence 257 (C):158-207.