Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Homeric Pathos and Objectivity.Jasper Griffin - 1976 - Classical Quarterly 26 (02):161-.
    One of the most striking differences between ancient and modern writings on Homer is the prominence in the former, and the rarity in the latter, of discussions of pathos. The word barely appears in the most characteristic books of our time on the subject. Thus the inquirer will find in Wace and Stubbings's Companion to Homer an index hospitable enough to include ‘Babylonian cuneiform’, and ‘Kum-Tepe, neolithic-site at’, and ‘Pig-keeping, in Homer’; but for ‘pathos’ he will look in vain.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  • Homeric Pathos and Objectivity.Jasper Griffin - 1976 - Classical Quarterly 26 (2):161-187.
    One of the most striking differences between ancient and modern writings on Homer is the prominence in the former, and the rarity in the latter, of discussions of pathos. The word barely appears in the most characteristic books of our time on the subject. Thus the inquirer will find in Wace and Stubbings's Companion to Homer an index hospitable enough to include ‘Babylonian cuneiform’, and ‘Kum-Tepe, neolithic-site at’, and ‘Pig-keeping, in Homer’; but for ‘pathos’ he will look in vain.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation