Where are you organizationally situated? Views from here

Critical Research on Religion 4 (3):279-285 (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

We reflect personally and historically on some of the institutions that have nurtured and shaped conversations at the intersections of sociology and religious studies, particularly professional associations. Our argument is simple. The ways different scholars understand the relationship between the sociology of religion and religious studies have a lot to do with the institutions that nurtured us and through which we engage in the conversation. We push back on simple black and white distinctions that paint their approaches in oppositions: more historical vs. more contemporary, more qualitative vs. more quantitative, more concerned with normative concerns vs. more “objective”—in favor of a more nuanced view. We keep in mind the Christian origins of the main professional organizations at these intersections and call for deeper dialogue not just between sociologists and scholars in religious studies but with colleagues involved with a range of other groups.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,752

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Sociology and theology reconsidered.John D. Brewer - 2007 - History of the Human Sciences 20 (2):7-28.
Ukrainian Association of Religious Studies.Mykhailo Babiy - 1996 - Ukrainian Religious Studies 1:49-51.
Every question is open: Looking for paths beyond the clearing.Robert A. Orsi - 2016 - Critical Research on Religion 4 (3):260-266.
The Religious Difference in Clinical Healthcare.Mark J. Hanson - 1998 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 7 (1):57-67.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-11-20

Downloads
5 (#1,536,375)

6 months
3 (#965,065)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?