Technoscience, regulation and language manipulation

Revista de Filosofia Aurora 33 (58) (2021)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The article focuses on some discursive defects that influence on decision-making around issues of science and technology (technoscience). Particularly, the nature and use of the linguistic phenomenon known as bullshit are analysed, and the results of this analysis are placed into the general context of the controversy about climate change. The conclusion emphasizes the relevance of avoiding confusions and humbug in the information available to the public and linked to decisions in the realm of science policy or regulation.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,031

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Lessons from Environmental Regulation.Amy Sinden - 2018 - Hastings Center Report 48 (S1):56-64.
Jean-François Lyotard and Postmodern Technoscience.Massimiliano Simons - 2022 - Philosophy and Technology 35 (2):1-19.
State-level regulation to combat climate change.Allison Hoppe - 2018 - In Eamon Doyle (ed.), The role of science in public policy. New York: Greenhaven Publishing.
Technoscience: “Where the Danger Is, Grows the Saving Power Also”.Lada V. Shipovalova - 2020 - Epistemology and Philosophy of Science 57 (1):45-50.
Towards a hermeneutic of technomedical objects.Kjetil Rommetveit - 2008 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 29 (2):103-120.

Analytics

Added to PP
2021-04-10

Downloads
17 (#895,414)

6 months
6 (#588,740)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations