Field, frame and focus : methodological issues in the new legal world

In Rob van Gestel, Hans-W. Micklitz & Edward L. Rubin (eds.), Rethinking legal scholarship: a transatlantic dialogue. New York, NY, USA: Cambridge University Press (2017)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,438

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Promise of Legal Semiotics.Sophie Cacciaguidi-Fahy & Annabelle Mooney - 2009 - International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue Internationale de Sémiotique Juridique 22 (4):381-386.
Exploring Technological Frontiers: Autonomy in Legal Scholarship.Lyria Bennett Moses - 2010 - Bulletin of Science, Technology and Society 30 (1):22-25.
Methodological frame of the field. Manu - 2005 - Hyderabad, Patna, New Delhi: New age Books.
Frame Modeling Method in Teaching and Learning Legal Terminology.Anastasia Ignatkina - 2018 - Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric 53 (1):81-104.
Inclusive Legal Positivism.William H. Wilcox & W. J. Waluchow - 1997 - Philosophical Review 106 (1):133.
A Rotating Quantum Vacuum.V. A. De Lorenci & N. F. Svaiter - 1999 - Foundations of Physics 29 (8):1233-1264.
Genealogies of Balancing as Discourse.Jacco Bomhoff - 2010 - Law and Ethics of Human Rights 4 (1):109-139.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-12-09

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references