Lev P. Karsavin on the Phenomenology of Revolution

Russian Studies in Philosophy 60 (6):452-461 (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article attempts to analyze Karsavin’s theory of revolution in the broader context of a Russian metaphysics of revolution in order to determine the place of Karsavin’s phenomenology of revolution both in his work and within Eurasianist ideology. His article “Phenomenology of Revolution” ontologically links two key concepts within Karsavin’s understanding: the “symphonic person” and the “ruling stratum.” The meaning of revolution consists in leading the symphonic person to a realization of its main tasks, which require the utmost exertion and are related to the very existence of its historical form. This crisis can result in the person’s death, but in the death of the old person is born a new individuation of a higher order of personhood for whom that revolution has been a rebirth. If the symphonic person succeeds in “being revived through death or recovery,” then this will also be the birth of a new ruling stratum and a new government, that is, its new being as a state. Karsavin thus clarifies the historical functions both of the symphonic person and of the ruling stratum. The latter turns out to be a kind of entelechy of the symphonic person, providing its own personal content to the generic concept. The concept of the ruling stratum is explained in the metaphysical context of the symphonic-person theory. In light of the symphonic person’s mission, the ruling stratum is an organic connection among individuals of the active sociocultural segment of the population that has resonated with the spirit of history and the people. In this case, the stratum “rules” along with parties and institutions, eventually passing judgment on them. The main results of Karsavin’s work are (1) modeling a developmental phase of revolution and (2) the concept of the ruling stratum, which allows us to avoid formal sociological understanding of the active elite and direct our attention to the connection between personal activity and the “silent” but by no means “sleeping” substrate of the nation that manifests itself in critical epochs.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,571

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Karsavin as philosopher of personality.Sergej Horužij - 2009 - Studies in East European Thought 61 (2-3):97-104.
Karsavin, Eurasianism, and the All-Union Communist Party.S. S. Khoruzhii - 1995 - Russian Studies in Philosophy 34 (3):10-25.
Lev Karsavin: Theological path of all-unity.Oleg Davydov - 2020 - HTS Theological Studies 76 (1):1-5.
Filosofii︠a︡ istorii.Lev Platonovich Karsavin - 1923 - S.-Peterburg: AO Komplekt.

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-03-31

Downloads
11 (#1,130,421)

6 months
3 (#967,057)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references