Polemological Paradigm of Hybrid War Research

Философия И Космология 19:97-109 (2017)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article is devoted to the methodological problems and manipulative mechanisms of hybrid warfare. Owing to the polemological approach the authors managed to systematize and summarize the theories of war and peace, clarify contemporary western concepts of warfare, outline the specifi cs of the Russian view on the hybrid war concept, assess the signifi cance of information and manipulation technologies for hybrid wars, analyze a number of geopolitical and socio-cultural dimensions of modern hybrid wars. The polemology is a branch of science, which studies the nature of armed confl icts and wars, their role in time and space, cycles, intensity, scope, scale, and causative relations and their classifi cation. Polemology deals with the wars and armed confl icts of the past, present and future. Novel hybrid wars take a respective place among them. They involve using all available warfare, regular and irregular, cyber and those allowing for the use of weapons of mass destruction, and also information, psychological and propaganda war using the latest information and media technologies. According to the classical approach, the state is the only subject of military actions, but today its role has changed dramatically under the infl uence of other political and economic supranational and trans-border factors. For the purpose of studying wars and armed confl icts from the polemological perspective it means the need to focus on social changes in all the areas of human life, on considering various elements of the political, economic or even technological context, which infl uence the war as a social phenomenon.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,907

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Hybrid Identities and Hybrid Equational Logic.Klaus Denecke - 1995 - Mathematical Logic Quarterly 41 (2):190-196.
Hybrid Theories.Christopher Woodard - 2015 - In Guy Fletcher (ed.), The Routledge Handbook of Philosophy of Well-Being. Routledge. pp. 161-174.
Hybrid Management Configurations in Joint Research.Roland Bal, Marleen Bekker & Rik Wehrens - 2014 - Science, Technology, and Human Values 39 (1):6-41.
Modal Hybrid Logic.Andrzej Indrzejczak - 2007 - Logic and Logical Philosophy 16 (2-3):147-257.
Hybrid Accounts of Ethical Thought and Talk.Teemu Toppinen - 2017 - In Tristram Colin McPherson & David Plunkett (eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Metaethics. New York: Routledge. pp. 243-259.
Decision procedures for some strong hybrid logics.Andrzej Indrzejczak & Michał Zawidzki - 2013 - Logic and Logical Philosophy 22 (4):389-409.
A User’s Guide to Hybrid Tools.Caleb Perl - 2020 - Mind 129 (513):129-158.

Analytics

Added to PP
2021-08-05

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Modernity and war: Anthropological approach in polemology.A. A. Kravchenko & O. V. Starovoit - 2018 - Anthropological Measurements of Philosophical Research 13:79-86.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references