Mill on Censorship

Philosophy in the Contemporary World 6 (1):33-37 (1999)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This essay argues that John Stuart Mill is not the radical anti-censorship thinker he is sometimes supposed to be. By describing a contemporary case ofa journalist who denied the holocaust, I show that there is evidence in Mill that supports the position that the journalist should have been censored.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,100

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Mill on Censorship.Frances E. Gill - 1999 - Philosophy in the Contemporary World 6 (1):33-37.
Two Essays on Freedom of Speech and Press.Nanette Barbara Funk - 1981 - Dissertation, Cornell University

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-02-15

Downloads
7 (#1,389,208)

6 months
3 (#980,137)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references