A Proconsul’s administration of Rome?

Hermes 150 (2):190 (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Research questions asked about Pompeius’ cura annonae – often termed “grain command” – dwell mainly on what made it more like any other promagistracy. Scholars tend to approach this office as if it were a kind of military command, albeit innovative. However, unlike promagistrates before him, Pompeius was endowed with the task which concerned the sphere domi. While not neglected, this aspect of Pompeius’ power becomes even more significant if appreciated through the lens of a more general problem of late-republican promagistrates’ interference in the sphere of domestic politics. This paper aims to supplement scholarly observations on the cura annonae, including F. Vervaet’s recent findings, by reconsidering especially the evidence on Pompeius’ making or revising a list of grain recipients.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,963

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Public slaves in Rome: ‘Privileged’ or not?Franco Luciani - 2020 - Classical Quarterly 70 (1):368-384.
Le proconsul Rabirius.Théophile Homolle - 1882 - Bulletin de Correspondance Hellénique 6 (1):608-612.
L. Volcacius Tullus, Proconsul of Asia.A. H. M. Jones - 1955 - The Classical Review 5 (3-4):244-245.
Un nouveaux proconsul d'Achaïe.Théodore Reinach - 1900 - Bulletin de Correspondance Hellénique 24 (1):324-328.
On Life and Death. Cicero & Marcus Tullius Cicero - 2017 - Oxford University Press UK.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-06-09

Downloads
11 (#1,138,639)

6 months
6 (#522,028)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references