The devil's picture book and tautology fetishism: A response to Sosteric et al. regarding the tarot and decolonial futures

Anthropology of Consciousness 35 (1):123-131 (2024)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

A recent Letter to the Editor in Anthropology of Consciousness, by Sosteric, Ratkovic, and Sosteric, is positioned as a critique of my article “Imaginal Research for Unlearning Mastery: Divination With Tarot as a Decolonizing Methodology.” The letter posits that the esoteric tarot is a repository of colonial ideological propaganda, and because of that, it cannot and should not be used as a tool for decolonial practices. However, the letter is misleading in its implications that what I have proposed in my article cannot be a methodology for decolonizing mental models, and includes statements about my position which are incorrect. This response clarifies and expands on ideas from my article—both about the tarot and also about the carceral mental models my article attempts to address—in part by highlighting the modern/colonial underpinnings of Sosteric et al.'s critique.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,709

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The devil and philosophy.Robert Arp (ed.) - 2014 - Chicago: Open Court.
The Devil’s Lying Wonders.John Beaudoin - 2007 - Sophia 46 (2):111 - 126.

Analytics

Added to PP
2024-02-06

Downloads
16 (#903,096)

6 months
16 (#154,895)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?