Hume's Doctrine on the Origin of Imaginations from Transcendent Philosophy Point of view

Kheradnameh Sadra Quarterly 16 (unknown)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The author believes that all the transcendent philosophers agree with Hume on this fact, that the man's knowledge is obtained by the senses contact with the objects, and before this contact, the mind has no imagination. But, in these philosophers' doctrine, there are many differences with Hume's. Apart from the "forms in sensation", or in Hume's words, "impressions'", they divide all the other perceptions into three kinds: forms in imagination, first intelligibles and second intelligibles. And except the forms in imagination, they don't consider two other kinds, deriven from the forms in sensation; and unlike Hume, they don't consider universal conceptions, which are among the first intelligibes, and concepts such as causuality and substance, which are among the second intelligibles, as imaginary, at all.Instead, they consider them, particularly the second intelligibles, as the most important man's conceptions and imaginations, implying to the external world.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,075

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-02-12

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references