“Being Human”: Edward Bond’s Theories of Drama

Text Matters - a Journal of Literature, Theory and Culture 7 (7):307-329 (2017)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The playwright Edward Bond has recalled the impact of seeing photographs of Nazi atrocities at the end of World War Two: “It was the ground zero of the human soul.” He argues we need a different kind of drama, based in “a new interpretation of what it means to be human.” He has developed an extensive body of theoretical writings to set alongside his plays. Arguably, his own reflections on “what it means to be human” are based in his reaction to the Holocaust, and his attempt to confront “the totality of evil.” Bond argues we are born “radically innocent.” There is a “pre-psychological” state of being. The neonate does not “read” ideology; it has to use its own imagination to make sense of the world. To enter society, however, the child must be corrupted; its imagination is “ideologized.” Bond claims that “radical innocence” can never wholly be lost. Through drama, we can escape “ideology” and recover our “autonomy.” It leads us to confront extreme situations, and to define for ourselves “what it means to be human.” The terms of Bond’s theory are Manichean. His arguments are based in the assumption that there is a fundamental “humanity” that exists prior to socialization. In fact, the process of socialization begins at birth. As an account of child development, “radical innocence” does not stand up to close scrutiny. Arguably, however, Bond’s work escapes the confines of his own theory. It can be read, not in terms of the “ideologized” vs. the “autonomous” mind, but rather, in terms of “conscious” and “unconscious.” In Coffee, Bond takes character of Nold on a journey into the Dantean hell of his own unconscious. He does not recover his “innocence,” but, rather, he has to face the darkness of both history and the psyche.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,897

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

James Bond and Philosophy: Questions are Forever.Jacob M. Held & James B. South (eds.) - 2006 - Chicago: E-Publications@Marquette.
The Biological Base of Morality?Paul R. Lawrence - 2004 - The Ruffin Series of the Society for Business Ethics 4:59-79.
A modern version of Lewis’s theory of valency.Peter G. Nelson - 2015 - Foundations of Chemistry 17 (2):153-162.
Moral Obligation and Human Goodness.Edward Jarvis Bond - 1964 - Dissertation, Cornell University
Theories of the chemical bond and its true nature.G. K. Vemulapalli - 2008 - Foundations of Chemistry 10 (3):167-176.
The source of chemical bonding.Paul Needham - 2014 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 45:1-13.
The Biological Base of Morality?Paul R. Lawrence - 2004 - The Ruffin Series of the Society for Business Ethics 4:59-79.
Corporate Bond Covenants and Social Responsibility Investment.Guifeng Shi & Jianfei Sun - 2015 - Journal of Business Ethics 131 (2):285-303.
Two conceptions of the chemical bond.Robin Findlay Hendry - 2008 - Philosophy of Science 75 (5):909-920.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-12-21

Downloads
29 (#550,982)

6 months
5 (#639,324)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Commentary.John K. Davis - 1999 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 8 (4):435-439.
Commentary.John A. Davis - 1983 - Journal of Medical Ethics 9 (4):217.

Add more references