Balzac and Theory, Balzac as Theory

Paragraph 32 (2):197-213 (2009)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article considers the changing relationship between Balzac and theory from the 1970s onwards when Balzac was a favoured, if disparaged, object of theorization, as in Barthes's S/Z. More recent critics, however, see the multi-layered énonciations of/in his texts as evidence of their ability to theorize their own relationship to history, society, sexuality — and literature. In the same way, moreover, as texts such as Sarrasine and Une passion dans le désert critique their own relation to literature, ostensibly theoretical Balzac texts such as Une théorie de la démarche turn theory into a form of fiction. Whether moving from literature to theory or from theory to literature, Balzac — or ‘Balzac’/Balzac — is thus shown to be a nexus of literature, theory and literary theory.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,592

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Realidad y Fantasía En Balzac.Ezequiel Martínez Estrada - 1964 - Universidad Nacional Del Sur.
Balzac et le philosophe inconnu.Maurice Roche - 1951 - [L'imprimerie Gilbert-Clarey].
Balzac. --.Ramon Fernandez - 1943 - Stock, Delamain Et Boutelleau.

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-04-20

Downloads
5 (#1,533,504)

6 months
5 (#627,481)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Neo-classic: Alain Badiou's Being and Event.Peter Osborne - 2007 - Radical Philosophy 142:19-29.

Add more references