Step by step – Building representations in algebraic logic

Journal of Symbolic Logic 62 (1):225-279 (1997)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

We consider the problem of finding and classifying representations in algebraic logic. This is approached by letting two players build a representation using a game. Homogeneous and universal representations are characterized according to the outcome of certain games. The Lyndon conditions defining representable relation algebras (for the finite case) and a similar schema for cylindric algebras are derived. Finite relation algebras with homogeneous representations are characterized by first order formulas. Equivalence games are defined, and are used to establish whether an algebra is ω-categorical. We have a simple proof that the perfect extension of a representable relation algebra is completely representable. An important open problem from algebraic logic is addressed by devising another two-player game, and using it to derive equational axiomatisations for the classes of all representable relation algebras and representable cylindric algebras. Other instances of this approach are looked at, and include the step by step method

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,438

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
189 (#102,301)

6 months
11 (#226,317)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

Model Theory.Michael Makkai, C. C. Chang & H. J. Keisler - 1991 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 56 (3):1096.
Temporal constraint networks.Rina Dechter, Itay Meiri & Judea Pearl - 1991 - Artificial Intelligence 49 (1-3):61-95.
Cylindric Algebras. Part I.Leon Henkin, J. Donald Monk, Alfred Tarski, L. Henkin, J. D. Monk & A. Tarski - 1985 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 50 (1):234-237.
Cylindric Algebras. Part II.Leon Henkin, J. Donald Monk & Alfred Tarski - 1988 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 53 (2):651-653.

View all 10 references / Add more references