Review of Joseph Horovitz: Law and Logic: A Critical Account of Legal Argument [Book Review]

Ethics 84 (1):89-92 (1973)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1086/291907

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,592

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Law and Logic. A Critical Account of Legal Argument.Nicholas A. Vonneuman - 1974 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 39 (3):619-619.
Review: Joseph Horovitz, Law and Logic. A Critical Account of Legal Argument. [REVIEW]Nicholas A. Vonneuman - 1974 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 39 (3):619-619.
Book Review:Law and Logic: A Critical Account of Legal Argument. Joseph Horovitz. [REVIEW]Lawrence C. Becker - 1973 - Ethics 84 (1):89-.
Logic and Law: A Critical Account of Legal Argument. By Joseph Horovitz. New York and Wien: Springer-Verlag, 1972. Pp.xvi, 213. [REVIEW]William Eastman - 1974 - Dialogue 13 (3):630-631.
Ulrich Klug's Legal Logic. A critical account'.Joseph Horovitz - 1966 - Logique Et Analyse 33 (33):78.
AI & Law, Logic and Argument Schemes.Henry Prakken - 2005 - Argumentation 19 (3):303-320.
Legality Without the Rule of Law? Scott Shapiro on Wicked Legal Systems: Critical Notice: Legality by Scott Shapiro.David Dyzenhaus - 2012 - Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence 25 (1):183-200.
Legal logic? Or can we do without?Arend Soeteman - 2003 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 11 (2-3):197-210.
Advances in the Theory of Argumentation Schemes and Critical Questions.David Godden & Douglas Walton - 2007 - Informal Logic 27 (3):267-292.
Arguments that take Counterconsiderations into Account.Jan Albert van Laar - 2014 - Informal Logic 34 (3):240-275.
20th-Century Bulgarian Philosophy of Law: From Critical Acceptance of Kant’s Ideas to the Logic of Legal Reasoning.Vihren Bouzov - 2016 - In Enrico Pattaro & C. Roversi (eds.), A Treatise of Legal Philosophy and General Jurisprudence. V.12 (1), Legal Philosophy in the Twentieth Century: The Civil Law World. pp. 681-690.
The Three Types of Aim-based Legal Arguments.Liang Qing-Yin - unknown
A Theory of Argument.Mark Vorobej - 2006 - Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
On relationships between the logic of law, legal positivism and semiotics of law.Vadim Verenich - 2011 - Sign Systems Studies 39 (2/4):145-195.
Legal realism regained: saving realism from critical acclaim.Wouter De Been - 2008 - Stanford, Calif.: Stanford Law Books.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-02-17

Downloads
10 (#1,186,283)

6 months
3 (#967,057)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Lawrence C. Becker
University of Chicago

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references