Widerlegung: Umrisse der Begriffsgeschichte

Archiv für Begriffsgeschichte 46:9-28 (2004)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

What do we mean, when we claim that something is »refuted«? The present essay deals with the evolution of the notion of refutation. Nowadays, refutations do not enjoy that high estimation in intellectual life as formerly – a lost of credit that is due to the removal of the Aristotelian pattern of refutation and its having been replaced by a more demanding pattern during the 16th – 18th centuries. On the one hand, the modern pattern pushed the Enlightenment culture, on the other hand, it ended up in a sceptical crisis. At first, this crisis concerned only philosophy. Finally, even the conclusiveness of empirical refutations was disputed. The philosophical way of doing Begriffsgeschichte, whereof the present essay is a specimen, centers on the long-term impact of definitions and distinctions. From this point of view, special attention is called to the contribution of the 18th-century Wolffianism.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,758

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Archiv für Begriffsgeschichte. Band 46.[author unknown] - 2004 - Archiv für Begriffsgeschichte 46.
Haben Begriffe Geschichte?Sven K. Knebel - forthcoming - Archiv für Begriffsgeschichte.
Begriffsgeschichte als dialektischer Prozeß.Hermann Lübbe - 1975 - Archiv für Begriffsgeschichte 19:8-15.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-03-24

Downloads
8 (#1,338,304)

6 months
5 (#700,287)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references